Legal Opinion

In Re Charles A. Muer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1998No. 96-2111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

146 F.3d 410

1998 A.M.C. 2668

In re Charles A. MUER.

ESTATE OF Charles A. MUER, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

C.A. Muer Corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

Robert A. KARBEL, Personal Representative of the Estate of

George F. Drummey and Lynne Drummey, Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 96-2111.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 28, 1997.

Decided June 9, 1998.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1998.

Jeffrey T. Stewart (argued and briefed), Seikaly & Stewart, Southfield, MI, for Intervenor-Appellant.

John L. Cote' (argued and briefed), Curtis R. Hadley (briefed), Willingham & Cote', East Lansing, MI, Norbert…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Cole; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hickam v. SegarsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2012
  2. In the Matter of the Complaint of Lance Staughton, owner of S/V Bat Out of Hell, for Exoneration from or Limitation of LiabilityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API