Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Scripps Health

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 18, 2017No. D070390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, J.

*556Plaintiff and appellant Paul Kendall's second amended complaint asserts several types of class-wide claims that challenge the billing and collection practices of the health facility operating an emergency room *557where he received care, defendant and respondent Scripps Health (Scripps). As relevant here, Kendall seeks declaratory relief on contract interpretation theories, and remedies under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA; Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq. ) and the unfair competition law (UCL; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. ; both are sometimes designated the statutory claims). Under the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Hefczyc v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. (PC)Willard v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Gray v. Dignity HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Kirelly Taylor v. F. Harris, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API