Legal Opinion
Kirelly Taylor v. F. Harris, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 5, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00779Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIRELLY TAYLOR, No. 1:25-cv-00779-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 F. HARRIS, et al., (ECF No. 16) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed March 23, 2026. 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants F. 22 Harris and S. Covey. (ECF No. 12.) 23 On…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.