Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1933No. 22857PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. It is well settled that an absolute refusal to pay or a denial of-liability dispenses with the necessity of making formal proofs of loss under a policy of insurance. Thornton v. Travelers Ins. Co., 116 Ga. 121, 132 (42 S. E. 287, 94 Am. St. R. 99); Continental Ins. Co. v. Wickham, 110 Ga. 129 (2) (35 S. E. 287). Where the attorney for the insured applied to the insurer for blanks on which to make proof of loss, advising the insurer that the insured, was totally disabled, and the insurer sent its agent to confer with the attorney, and the agent, acting for the insurer, stated that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. New York Life Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Marchant v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Continental Insurance v. WickhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Patrick v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Schneider v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Liner v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Moseley v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Johnson v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API