Lutz v. Force
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
Russell Lutz and his wife, Charlotte, instituted an action in trespass to recover damages resulting from an intersection collision between a Pontiac automobile, *612owned by Russell and operated by Charlotte, and a Dodge automobile owned and operated by Harry Force. Harry filed a counterclaim against Charlotte. Russell’s claim was for damage to his car and loss of use thereof, and for his wife’s medical expenses and loss of her society. Charlotte’s claim was for pain and suffering, loss of wages, and permanent injury. Harry’s counterclaim was for car damage, pain and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fisher v. DyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Clewell v. PummerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hartigan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Elser v. Union Paving Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Anderson v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Johnson v. ShindehiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958