Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Dye

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1956No. Appeals, 14, 15, 16 and 19PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

Following the not unusual pattern in automobile collision cases the stories told by the parties here involved are hopelessly at variance with one another. According to Vincent G. Fisher, he was operating a Mercury Coupe on May 3, 1953, at about 2:15 A.M. eastwardly on Eoute 22 (Jonestown Eoad) near Harrisburg; as he approached 39th Street a Dodge Sedan driven by Allen J. Dye in which his wife Leticia M. Dye was a passenger, and which had been proceeding westwardly on Eoute 22, made a diagonal left-hand turn into 39th Street when Fisher was only 10 to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murray v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Critzer Et Ux. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Minkin v. MinkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Burns v. Goldberg (Malamut, Third Party Defendant). Appeal of Malamut. Appeal of GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Long v. Pan American Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Thelma Greiner v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengeselleschaft and Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Couts v. GhionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Hawthorne v. Dravo Corp., Keystone Div.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API