Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cason v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1958No. Appeal, 401Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Weight, J.:

It is my view that the lower court erred in not granting a new trial generally. Appellant asserted in the court below, and with considerable justification, that there was insufficient evidence to establish negligence on his part. He raises the same contention on this appeal. It is manifestly unfair to afford the plaintiffs a second chance on the question of damages, without also affording appellant a second chance on the question of liability. See Esposito v. Henderson, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 479, 137 A. 2d 902.

The three cases cited by the court below, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Buren v. EberhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Baraonfski v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Hanus v. K. M. B. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. ESPOSITO v. HendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Lutz v. ForceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API