Stokes v. U.S. Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss
URBINA, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon defendants’ motion to dismiss; plaintiff’s memorandum in opposition; defendants’ reply; 1 plaintiff’s reply and defendants’ sur-reply. 2 The court concludes that the defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be granted because this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this controversy as the plaintiff has not met the “presentment” requirements contained in the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) 28 U.S.C. Sections 2401(b) and 2675 et seq.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Tonyia…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- OLANIYI v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gabriel v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hall v. Administrative Office of the United States CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Velasco v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Lacey v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.