Legal Opinion
Lacey v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 12, 1999No. 98-1760(PLF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts I, II and IV of plaintiffs’ amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The defendants argue that the Court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ Privacy Act claims (Counts I and II) because the statute of limitations has run. See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(5). They also maintain that plaintiffs have not satisfied the statutory exhaustion requirements that are a condition precedent to the filing of a Federal Tort Claims…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Tijerina v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Angelo M. Diliberti v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armstrong v. VanceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Sweeney v. American Registry of PathologyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Williams v. Washington D.C. Eviction MarshalsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016