Legal Opinion

Hanes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1992No. 58764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Judge.

Movant William Hanes appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following an evidentiary hearing which denied his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. He asserts that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of capital murder in violation of § 565.001 RSMo 1980 [repealed]. The trial court sentenced him to life without the possibility of parole for fifty years. This sentence was vacated upon stipulation of the parties that mov-ant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a timely motion for new…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State v. LopezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. William Hanes v. David Dormire, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. State v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API