Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Faria

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 6, 1973No. 1895-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

The defendants in this civil action are the town clerk, the councilmen, the building inspector, and various other officials of the town of Bristol. The plain tiffs are the owners of two parcels of Bristol real estate. A jury-waived trial was held in the Superior Court. Only the question of liability was tried at this time. The trial justice denied and dismissed the plaintiffs’ three-count complaint which charged (1) that a 1971 recision of a 1970 zoning ordinance amendment was illegal; (2) that the council had conspired to deprive the plaintiffs of all beneficial use of their land; and (3)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Crall v. City of LeominsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Pierson Trapp Company v. PeakCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Building & Development Corp. v. Town of JamestownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  2. Beaufort v. Warwick Credit UnionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Paradis v. Zarella, 92-1422 (1996)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  4. Read Lundy, Inc. v. the W.A. Trust Compy. of Westerly, 99-2859 (2002)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. State v. Lead Industries Association, Inc., 99-5226 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API