Legal Opinion

State v. Smissaert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1985No. 50500-4PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*638Dimmick, J.

The Court of Appeals dismissed as untimely petitioner Smissaert's appeal of the original judgment in a case in which the trial court later entered a corrected sentence nunc pro tunc. We affirm the trial court's imposition of a life sentence, but reverse the nunc pro tunc entry of sentence. In so doing, we articulate a new rule: When imposition of an increased sentence is required to correct a judicial error, the defendant should be placed in the same position as if the error had not occurred.1 Under this rule, petitioner will receive credit for any time served and regain his right…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of CarleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PascalWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API