Legal Opinion
Estrada v. AERT, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided November 19, 2014No. CV-14-32PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge.
| ,This statutory-interpretation case raises an issue in workers’-compensation law: When did the two-year statute of limitations begin to run on Maria Estrada’s unscheduled, gradual-onset back injury?
I
Estrada worked as an embosser at AERT, Inc., from 2005 to 2012. That job required her to lift and stack large pieces of wood for twelve hours at a stretch. According to Estrada, the job caused some back pain that she dealt with until it became too severe and required surgery. Estrada then made a medical-treatment claim and a temporary total-disability benefits claim.
[…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pifer v. Single Source TransportationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Miller v. EndersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Hall's Cleaners v. WorthamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Cottage Café, Inc. v. ColletteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Intents, Inc. v. Southwestern Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.E.R.T., Inc. v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Estrada v. AERT, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014