Legal Opinion
United States Jaycees v. Bloomfield
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1981No. 79-1141PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
This is another litigative skirmish in the continuing legal battle that has been waged before various courts and administrative agencies in other jurisdictions over the lawfulness of the proviso in the bylaws of the United States Jaycees (Jaycees) that only males between the ages of 18 and 35 may be members. 1 See New York City Jaycees, Inc. v. United States Jaycees, Inc., 512 F.2d 856 (2d Cir. 1975); Junior Chamber of Commerce v. Missouri State Junior Chamber of Commerce, 508 F.2d 1031 (8th Cir. 1975); Junior Chamber of Commerce of Rochester v. United States Jaycees,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- A Quaker Action Group v. Walter J. HickelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Nat. Org. for Women v. Little League Baseball, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Bender v. Design Store Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States Jaycees v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Simard v. Resolution Trust Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Welsh v. Boy Scouts of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States Jaycees v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Dale v. Boy Scouts of America & Monmouth CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Georgetown Entertainment Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.