Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Whitaker
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Chief Justice.
The appellants, the Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, James L. La Prelle, Mrs. Mary J. Talbot, Rosa F. La Prelle, joined by her husband, John La Prelle, and Reagan Dickson, a minor, by his guardian, John La Prelle, sued Cyrus Whitaker, as sheriff of Falls County, and the sureties on his official bond, and the sureties upon an indemnity bond, and Meyberg & Rothchild Bros., attaching creditors. The plaintiffs’ action was for damages, the alleged value of certain goods and merchandise that were taken from their possession by the defendants under a writ of attachment in the suit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin Brown Co. v. PerrillTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Cabell v. Hamilton Brown Shoe CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Owens v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Ramsey v. McCauleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- Hall v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coleman v. ZappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Watson v. Texarkana Pipe WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Cadwell v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909
- Rogers v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.