Legal Opinion

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1893No. 281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

The appellants, the Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, James L. La Prelle, Mrs. Mary J. Talbot, Rosa F. La Prelle, joined by her husband, John La Prelle, and Reagan Dickson, a minor, by his guardian, John La Prelle, sued Cyrus Whitaker, as sheriff of Falls County, and the sureties on his official bond, and the sureties upon an indemnity bond, and Meyberg & Rothchild Bros., attaching creditors. The plaintiffs’ action was for damages, the alleged value of certain goods and merchandise that were taken from their possession by the defendants under a writ of attachment in the suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin Brown Co. v. PerrillTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cabell v. Hamilton Brown Shoe CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Owens v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ramsey v. McCauleyTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Hall v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Watson v. Texarkana Pipe WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Cadwell v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909
  5. Rogers v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API