Watson v. Texarkana Pipe Works
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The pertinent question is, Does the evidence on the part of the plaintiff show actionable negligence of appellee proximately-causing the alleged hurt to J. I. Watson? The negligent acts relied upon are, as alleged: “The standards on the wagon, used to hold the pipe on the wagon, had become worn and loose and would spread at the top so that the pipe loaded on the wagon would slip down and become wedged and fastened.” It does not appear by evidence that the wagon was “shackly.” In respect to the allegations, the evidence on the part of the plaintiff was to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Myers v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burton v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- United States Fidelity v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933