Legal Opinion
Cabell v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Company
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1891No. 7108PublishedCited by 28 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTON, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by appellees against W- L. Cabell, United States Marshal, the sureties on his official bond, and against the sureties on an indemnity bond given to the marshal to indemnify him in levying a writ of attachment sued out by Samuel 0. Davis & Co. against John La Prelle upon personal property claimed by appellees. The principals on the indemnity bond were not made parties, it being alleged they were not residents of this State and that they had no property within it. The marshal alleged that the principals on the indemnity bond had property within…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Lesher v. GetmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Lewis v. JohnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Knight v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Screws v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Hill CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Bowers v. Bryant-Link Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FossatiTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Sabine Motor Co. v. W. C. English Auto Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- A. C. Petri & Bro. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1892
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.