Schnierow v. Boutagy
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff obtained judgment in the sum of $502 against defendants as damages for breach of a contract whereby the latter agreed to lease to the former a storeroom then in process of construction. Defendants appeal upon the judgment-roll.
As alleged in the complaint and found by the court, plaintiff in reliance upon defendants’ agreement, disposed of his business on Temple Street at a loss of four hundred dollars, changed his residence at a cost of $15, and incurred a loss of time, to his damage in the sum of $87, in securing another storeroom.
Conceding the loss of time and expense of removal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Kaye v. MelzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Douglass v. Guardian Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933