Legal Opinion

Schnierow v. Boutagy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1917No. Civ. No. 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment in the sum of $502 against defendants as damages for breach of a contract whereby the latter agreed to lease to the former a storeroom then in process of construction. Defendants appeal upon the judgment-roll.

As alleged in the complaint and found by the court, plaintiff in reliance upon defendants’ agreement, disposed of his business on Temple Street at a loss of four hundred dollars, changed his residence at a cost of $15, and incurred a loss of time, to his damage in the sum of $87, in securing another storeroom.

Conceding the loss of time and expense of removal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt Bros. Co. v. San Lorenzo Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Kaye v. MelzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Douglass v. Guardian Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API