Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Mann

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1980No. 8010SC435PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is the trial court’s refusal to submit to the jury the issue of last clear chance. The doctrine of last clear chance allows a plaintiff to recover despite his own contributory negligence when the defendant could have avoided plaintiff’s injuries by exercising reasonable care and prudence, after plaintiff’s negligence had occurred, but failed to do so. Earle v. Wyrick, 286 N.C. 175, 209 S.E.2d 469 (1974), rehearing denied, 286 N.C. 547 (1975). The issue of last clear chance must be submitted to the jury if the evidence, viewed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Cockrell v. Cromartie Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Wray v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. OdellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Proffitt v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Bowden v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Hughes v. GraggCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Watson v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API