Cockrell v. Cromartie Transport Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The sole assignment of error properly preserved for our consideration on this appeal is the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on the doctrine of last clear chance. In its decision, the Court of Appeals concluded that last clear chance did not apply unless both parties were found negligent and held that the jury’s verdict in the instant case finding the operator of the truck not to be negligent mooted any possible error by the trial court in denying the requested instruction. We have determined that this holding was error; therefore, the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Wray v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.