Bell Rose Sanitarium, Inc. v. Metz
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a suit by plaintiff corporation to require defendant, a promoter of the corporation, (1) to account for corporate profits retained by defendant, and (2) to require defendant to specifically perform a stock subscription agreement or, in the alternative, to cancel defendant’s stock. The trial court granted the requested relief for an accounting and ordered defendant to specifically perform his stock subscription agreement.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in failing to cancel defendant’s stock. It is contended that the stock subscription agreement is invalid because it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1872
- Texas Portland Cement & Lime Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Schoren v. SchorenOregon Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Schlecht v. BlissOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Pearson v. SigmundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.