Legal Opinion

Portis v. Board of Public Utilities, Lepanto

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 2, 1948No. 4-8438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves two cases consolidated by order of the chancery court.

In the first case (No. 3412 on docket of the lower court), appellee, T. B. Goldsby, a taxpayer of the town of Lepanto, sought an injunction against the said town and its mayor and aldermen to prevent them from issuing revenue bonds of the municipal sewer and water plants to pay for certain improvements thereon, the proposed action of the mayor and aldermen being alleged to be illegal because of the fact that these plants were in charge of a Board of Public Utilities created in pursuance of Act 95 of the General…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Greenville Stone & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Gates v. SolomonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Adams v. PrimmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Davis v. Receivers St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Moody v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Portis v. Board of Public Utilities, LepantoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. LarsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Stephens v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API