Legal Opinion

Stephens v. City of Springdale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 25, 1961No. 5-2435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The appellants prosecute this appeal from a Decree of the Chancery Court (a) sustaining a demurrer to their amended and substituted complaint and (b) granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Since the record contains no statement to the effect that the appellants— plaintiffs below — elected to stand on their amended and substituted complaint after the demurrer was sustained, we cannot treat the order of the Court sustaining the demurrer as a final and appealable order. Portis v. Board, 212 Ark. 822, 208 S. W. 2d 772; and Ark. State Board v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cernauskas v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Railey v. City of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Board of Trustees, Univ. of Ark. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. LarsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Roberts v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. American Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Freeze v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Hollis v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Holliman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API