Stephens v. City of Springdale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The appellants prosecute this appeal from a Decree of the Chancery Court (a) sustaining a demurrer to their amended and substituted complaint and (b) granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Since the record contains no statement to the effect that the appellants— plaintiffs below — elected to stand on their amended and substituted complaint after the demurrer was sustained, we cannot treat the order of the Court sustaining the demurrer as a final and appealable order. Portis v. Board, 212 Ark. 822, 208 S. W. 2d 772; and Ark. State Board v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cernauskas v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Railey v. City of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Board of Trustees, Univ. of Ark. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Arkansas State Board of Architects v. LarsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Roberts v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. American Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Freeze v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Hollis v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Holliman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987