Legal Opinion · Dissent

Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 27, 1968No. 5-4568Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent as I think the rule indicated with reference to reviewability of an order denying a motion for summary judgment is wrong. I agree that no appeal lies from an order denying a summary judgment, as such order is interlocutory. Douglas v. Citizens Bank, 244 Ark. 168, 424 S. W. 2d 532.

I also agree that a motion for summary judgment should not be reviewed on appeal after a trial on the merits. See Bell v. Harmon, 284 S. W. 2d 812 (C. A. Ky. 1955); Safeway, Inc. v. Johnson, 311 F. 2d 387 (5th Cir. 1962); The Home Indemnity Company v. Reynolds & Company, 38 Ill. App. 2d 358…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Bell v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Russell v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Granite Mountain Rest Home, Inc. v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Campbell v. BastianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API