Legal Opinion

Lyle v. Mangar

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 15, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] In this case, we are asked to interpret the statutes that govern security deposits on residential rental units, 14 M.R.S. §§ 6031-6039 (2010), for the purpose of answering two questions: (1) may a landlord proceed on a claim to recover unpaid rent without first returning a tenant’s security deposit or providing a timely written statement of the reasons for retaining it, see id. § 6033, and (2) does the failure to provide such a written statement render the landlord’s withholding of the deposit irrebuttably wrongful in every instance, thereby requiring the imposition of double damages,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hl 1, LLC v. Riverwalk, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Ventresco v. BusheySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  3. Tisdale v. RawsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Anastos v. Town of BrunswickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Costa v. VogelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MaineToday Media, Inc. v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Adoption of Tobias D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Gumbs-Heyliger v. CMW & Associates Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Patrick Langevin v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  5. In re Steven L.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API