Legal Opinion
Inman v. Sullivan
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 17, 1992No. NA-91-87-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
DILLIN, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Bernice Inman, filed this action to challenge two policies that the defendant, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary), uses to determine eligibility for the amount of assistance due certain individuals under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program. The first policy is to count as unearned income to the SSI applicant or recipient any portion of a Veteran’s Administration (VA)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fair v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Estate of Krueger Ex Rel. Krueger v. Richland County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Estate of Krueger Ex Rel. Krueger v. Richland County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic EquipmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Olean F. Fair, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Dixie Foster v. Donna Shalala, Dixie Foster v. Donna Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994