Legal Opinion

Adams v. Wiesendanger

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1915No. Civ. No. 1554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles and from an order denying a new trial. Gavin W. Craig, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff was awarded judgment for damages for personal injuries which were alleged to have been sustained by reason of an automobile belonging to the defendant having collided with the person of the plaintiff. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It was admitted at the trial that the automobile, the operation of which caused plaintiff’s damage, was owned by the defendant, and in the bill of exceptions it is stated that there was evidence to show that the automobile was being negligently operated at the time of the accident. The undisputed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Tyler v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. House v. FryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Leno v. Young Men's Christian Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API