Legal Opinion
(PC) Fratus v. Dayson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 7, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00354Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOHN FRATUS, 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:20-cv-0354 TLN SCR P 12 v. 13 DAYSON, et al., ORDER 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff John Fratus’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 17 Reconsideration of the assigned magistrate judge’s June 30, 2025, order. (ECF No. 146.) For the 18 reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 19 On June 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. 20 (ECF No. 142.) Plaintiff stated he sought to amend the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas Burdick, Estate of Perrin v. Burdick v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.