Legal Opinion

Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. Burlington Ditch, Reservoir & Land Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1923No. 9,641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

In an irrigation adjudication proceeding in the district court of Douglas county in water district No. 8 a decree entered in the latter part of 1884 awarded to the High Line Canal, priority No. Ill for 1184 cubic feet per second as of January 18, 1879. The High Line Canal was owned by plaintiff in error and this action was brought by defendant in error to have all said priority in excess of 500 cubic feet adjudged abandoned. The trial court found that all of said priority in excess of 600 cubic feet had been abandoned *160prior to the bringing of the action and entered judgment accordingly. To…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. South Springs Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Mason v. Hills Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. South Boulder Canon Ditch Co. v. Davidson Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Commonwealth Irrigation Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API