Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Irrigation Co. v. Rio Grande Canal Water Users Ass'n

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 8, 1935No. 13,093PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Butler

In a suit wherein the Rio Grande Canal Water Users Association, the Monte Vista Water Users Association, the San Luis Valley Irrigation District and the San Luis Valley Canal Company were the plaintiffs, and the Commonwealth Irrigation Company, owner of the Empire canal (later known as the Commonwealth canal) was the defendant, the district court found and adjudged that of the 666.98 cubic feet of water per second of time theretofore decreed to the Empire canal all in excess of 512 cubic feet per second of time (i. e., 154.98) had been abandoned; and the court restrained and enjoined the Com…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. White v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Green Valley Ditch Co. v. FrantzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  2. Steel v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. South Springs Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  5. Cline v. McDowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API