Legal Opinion

Cox v. Essex Group, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 10, 1993No. 92-4073-RDRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Plaintiff is an employee of the defendant and is covered by the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between the defendant and Local Union No. 851 of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America (“union”). Plaintiff contends that the defendant has violated the terms of the CBA. He asserts that the defendant has failed to offer him overtime work as required by Article VI, Section 6(c) of the CBA. This…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samosky v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API