Legal Opinion

Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Spinden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1990No. WD 42927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge.

The narrow issue posed in this action in prohibition concerns the limits of discovery in an administrative case. Specifically, should a doctor, whose license is governed by a board that has filed a disciplinary complaint against him, be allowed to discover from the board before trial: 1) incident, occurrence or investigative reports proposed or possessed by the board; 2) reports created by or in the Board’s possession relating to the facts of the complaint; 3) statements taken relating to the facts; and, 4) documents provided by the board to any person expected to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. St. Louis Little Rock Hospital, Inc. v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Faith Hospital v. EnrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Anheuser v. NolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Chase Resorts, Inc. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Bodenhausen v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. WallemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Kenney v. VansittertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Edwards v. Missouri State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API