Bodenhausen v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Judge.
May a licensing board discipline a professional without involving the Administrative Hearing Commission? The circuit court answered “no”; the court of appeals agreed; this Court granted transfer. Mo. Const, art. V, § 10. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
I
On June 13, 1990, Gary Bodenhausen — a licensed physician — signed an agreement with the Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, stipulating that he had violated §§ 334.100.2(4)(h) and (13) RSMo Supp.1989. No complaint was ever filed with the Administrative Hearing Commission. The disci plinary agreement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gladys Child Soars v. Soars-Lovelace, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- State ex rel. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Hackman v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Byrd v. Board of Curators of Lincoln University of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Strozewski v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- L.B. v. State Committee of PsychologistsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Artman v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Gott v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Riverside Joint Venture v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.