Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Kmart Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 24, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the third-party defendant Sequoia Insurance Company (hereinafter Sequoia) is subject to personal jurisdiction in New York. In support of its motion, inter alia, to dismiss the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8), Sequoia submitted the affidavit of one of its vice presidents, who acknowledged that the company became licensed to conduct insurance business in New York prior to the commencement of the third-party action. Sequoia additionally admitted that, as required by Insurance Law § 1212, it appointed the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Augsbury Corp. v. Petrokey Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. STX Panocean (UK) Co. v. Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Rockefeller University v. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Le Vine v. Isoserve, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API