Legal Opinion
Le Vine v. Isoserve, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 18, 1972PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.
The defendants have instituted a motion
pursuant to CPLB 3211 for an order dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over them, or, if jurisdiction is available, then upon the ground that the causes of action set forth in the complaint are barred by the Statute of Limitations.
The underlying action sounds in negligence and plaintiffs seek to recover for injuries and damages due to radiation which was allegedly caused by a defective isotope. Plaintiff Harris D. Le Vine and Mary Z. Le Vine are married and the parents of the two infant plaintiffs, Mama E.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Carlton Properties, Inc. v. 328 Properties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Antonana v. Ore Steamship CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Devlin v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by14 opinions
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Augsbury Corp. v. Petrokey Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Rockefeller University v. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re DES CasesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.