Rockefeller University v. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge.
Defendant Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (“Ligand”) has moved to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. Alternatively, it seeks to transfer the action to the Southern District of California, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons set forth below, this court concludes that there is general jurisdiction over Ligand, venue is proper and the section 1404(a) factors do not favor transfer to another district. The motion is denied.
Background
The action was commenced in Supreme Court New York County…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Blair & Co., Inc. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Chatwal Hotels & Resorts LLC v. Dollywood Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- STX Panocean (UK) Co. v. Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Hunter v. Deutsche Lufthansa AGDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.