Legal Opinion

United States v. Dillard

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 4, 1980No. 33,040; SPCM 11708PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

per CURIAM: *

We must determine whether the appellant was entitled at trial to suppression of all illicit drugs and paraphernalia that had been found in her possession at her private, off-post quarters in Hauffstrasse, Salach, Germany. The evidence was discovered and seized pursuant to an oral search authorization that had not been reduced to writing by the commander, notwithstanding direction by paragraph 2-1(f) of USAREUR Supplement 1 to Army Regulation 190-22 that “[authorization to conduct searches and seizures described in the basic regulation and this supplement,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. HoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. AdcockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. FoustUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. BardenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. RiceU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API