United States v. Dillard
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
per CURIAM: *
We must determine whether the appellant was entitled at trial to suppression of all illicit drugs and paraphernalia that had been found in her possession at her private, off-post quarters in Hauffstrasse, Salach, Germany. The evidence was discovered and seized pursuant to an oral search authorization that had not been reduced to writing by the commander, notwithstanding direction by paragraph 2-1(f) of USAREUR Supplement 1 to Army Regulation 190-22 that “[authorization to conduct searches and seizures described in the basic regulation and this supplement,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. AdcockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. FoustUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. BardenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. RiceU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.