People v. Cooks
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In this case, defendant was charged with one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct,1 but testimony elicited from the complainant at trial referred to three incidents of sexual penetration. Although the jury was instructed in general terms that its verdict must be unanimous, defendant’s conviction of second-degree criminal sexual conduct was vacated by the Court of Appeals because the trial court refused to instruct *506the jurors that unanimous agreement about a specific act of penetration is required for conviction. Because materially identical evidence was offered with respect to each…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ChelmickiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.