Legal Opinion

Burndy Corp. v. U. S. Components, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROAKE, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement action.

Defendant objects to interrogatories numbered 15,16 and 17 of a group of interrogatories propounded by plaintiff on the grounds that these interrogatories deal with information relevant to questions of damages which are premature at this stage in the litigation. Plaintiff urges that the information requested is relevant to the issue of commercial success of the patent invention and should be supplied, even though it also relates to damages. In view of the established authorities, defendant’s objections to the interrogatories on these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Brother International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Wabash Photolamp Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. National Gypsum Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  4. In re Clorox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. Kent Pedersen, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API