Legal Opinion
Crane Co. v. Aeroquip Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 13, 1973No. 72 C 1403, 72 C 2755PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DECKER, District Judge.
These consolidated civil actions arise out of the settlement of an earlier patent infringement action between the same parties (Civil Action No. 67 C 988). In settlement of the foregoing civil action, plaintiff, Crane Co., and defendant, Aeroquip Corporation, negotiated a license agreement by the terms of which Crane granted to Aeroquip an exclusive license under United States Letters Patent No. 2,933,333 (the subject of the 1967 infringement action, hereinafter “the suit patent” or “the ’333 patent”). In turn, Aeroquip agreed to pay royalties to Crane…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stevens v. Howard D. Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, & Cross-Appellant v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crane Company v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
- Nebraska Engineering Corp. v. ShivversCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Flores v. KelleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1973
- Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.