Legal Opinion

Wabash Photolamp Corp. v. Ross Electric Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1948No. Nos. 2430, 3534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, Chief Judge.

Defendants object to plaintiff’s interrogatories in these patent suits. There are eight interrogatories. According to the brief submitted, after argument, by defendants they “waive their objections to all of the interrogatories except Interrogatories 3, 5, and 8”. The ground for such objections to these is that the information would be relevant and material only to the question of damages, after a finding of validity and infringement of plaintiff’s patents, and, that they are oppressive since they call for the disclosure of confidential business to a competitor.

There would…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  2. Burndy Corp. v. U. S. Components, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Burndy Corp. v. Sealectro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API