Legal Opinion

Scott v. Los Angeles Mountain Park Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1928No. Docket No. 3533PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiffs began this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $96,000 as damages alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiffs by reason of the failure of the defendant to convey a certain tract of land in the county of Los Angeles, embracing about 2% acres, being a part of a larger tract of land alleged to belong to the defendant, situate northwest of Santa Monica, in said county. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted and judgment thereon entered. From this judgment the plaintiffs appeal.

The complaint alleges that during the times…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Maynard v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeMartini v. Alexander Sanitarium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Findley v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. O'Connor v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Whiteside v. United TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Frye & Smith, Ltd. v. FooteAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API