Keenan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) Motion to Dismiss on the ground that under the Eleventh Amendment it is immune from suit in federal court. Plaintiffs have submitted an Opposition, and defendant WMATA has filed a Reply thereto. In addition, the Court has considered the supplemental memoranda on Eleventh Amendment immunity and subject-matter jurisdiction filed by the parties.
Plaintiffs’ cause of action in these two consolidated cases arises out of an incident between the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Texas Hospital Ass'n v. National Heritage InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1992
- Stephans v. State of Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1988
- Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Flores v. LongDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Boyle v. City of Liberty, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.