Legal Opinion
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1103 (RCL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Before the court are rules promulgated by the National Indian Gaming Commission under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701 et seq; all parties have moved for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the memoranda filed by all plaintiffs, by defendants, and by intervenor-defendants, and for the reasons stated below, the court finds that plaintiffs’ objections to the rules are meritless. Thus, plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment shall be denied. Defendants’ and intervenor-defendants’ motions for summary judgment shall be granted, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. 162 MegaMania Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. 103 Electronic Gambling DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.