Legal Opinion

Flores v. Long

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided August 17, 1995No. CIV 94-0731 LH/LFGPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HANSEN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 36). Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, having considered the applicable law, and otherwise being fully informed in the matter, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Department of Public Safety, and Plaintiffs official capacity claims against Defendants Long, Archibeque, Apodaca, Lloyd, and de Baca due to Eleventh Amendment immunity. As a result, the Court concludes, sua sponte,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Flores v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Archuleta v. LacuestaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Lowery v. Prince George's County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  4. Ward Ex Rel. Ward v. Presbyterian Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  5. Lujan v. Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API