Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCloskey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 11, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 32, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

We shall disbar in this case involving “quickie” foreign divorces and misleading attorney advertising.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against James B. McCloskey, a member of the Maryland Bar since November 10,1954. The petition alleged violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (4), and (5); 2-101(A)(2), (3), and (4); 2-109(1); 6-101(A)(l), and (2); and 7-102(A)(8).1

*679Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred the matter for hearing to a judge of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. TruetteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WillemainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Super v. BurkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCloskeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API