Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Willemain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 11, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

This is the second trip to this Court of this attorney where alcohol is said to be responsible for his violation of the Disciplinary Rules. See Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. Willemain, 297 Md. 386, 466 A.2d 1271 (1983), for the earlier occasion. We shall indefinitely suspend with the right to apply for readmission after two years subject to certain conditions.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against David Grant Willemain, a member of the Maryland Bar…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. In the Matter of LombardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MoreheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API