Legal Opinion

In re Kimball

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

There should be a reversal and a remission to the Appellate Division for a reconsideration of' appellant’s application for admission to the Bar. "While appellant’s status and past conduct may be now and has been in the past violative of accepted norms, they are not controlling, albeit relevant, in assessing character bearing on the right to practice law in this State. Notably, the Committee on Character and Fitness found appellant to be of good character and qualified at this time. With respect to the proceedings in the State of Florida, we accept the views expressed in the dissenting opinion…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Petition for Admission to the Minnesota State Bar Ex Rel. HaukeboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. In re P.New York Family Court · 1977
  5. In re NulleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API