Legal Opinion
Chase v. Reliable Mfg. Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 24, 1932No. 10490PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLET, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss upon the ground that it is disclosed upon the face of plaintiffs’ bill and the stipulation of the parties that defendant’s device for opening cans does not* infringe the patents sued upon (No. 1,617,148, February 8, 1927, and No. 1,670,-238, May 15,1928, issued to plaintiff Chase).
The stipulation is to the effect that defendant’s Exhibit “A” attached to its motion for a bill of particulars is of the construction complained of in the bill of complaint as constituting infringement.
In Bronk v. Charles H. Scott Co., 211 F. 338, 341 (C. C. A. 7)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bronk v. Charles H. Scott Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- Mallinson v. RyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
- Sprigg v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1915
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. American Valve & Meter Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weil v. N. J. Richman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Petersen v. General Seafoods Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Ceasar v. Joseph Pernick Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932