Legal Opinion
Gammino v. Cellco Partnership
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 4, 2007No. Civ. 04-4303PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM/ORDER
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This is a dispute over two patents that delineate processes and apparatuses for preventing telephones from making international calls. John Gammino owns those patents, and he claims that defendant Dav-el Corporation regularly infringes them by using the patented processes on pay tele phones that it owns and operates around the country. Davel disputes this and moves for summary judgment. Discovery is complete, and Davel’s motion is now ripe for disposition.
I. Facts
John Gammino owns U.S. Patent Nos. 5,809,125 (filed Sept. 15, 1998) and 5,812,-650…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Warner-Lambert Company v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. Tellme Networks Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Transcore, LP v. Caliber One Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009